Top Health News

NEW YORK (Reuters Life!) – Mammography is inferior accurate at soiling boob cancer if a blackamoor has had the disease before, according to a U.S. government-funded study.

Breast cancer survivors are more probable to develop new tumors than women without a story of boob cancer, but little is famous in discourse about display for survivors.

The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association and based on aggregation from the maximal mammography registry in the United States, showed that display does help notice boob cancer in survivors -- but not ofttimes enough.

"These findings and additional studies that are probable to be stimulated from this report should advance to reinforced (radiology routines)," said parliamentarian Smith of the American person Society, in a statement.

The study, led by Les Irwig of the University of Sydney in Australia, was the render work of U.S. and Australian researchers, who compared nearly 120,000 mammograms -- half from boob cancer survivors, half from those without a same story of boob cancer.

Within a year of screening, 655 tumors were institute in survivors, compared to 342 in the another women.

Seven cancers were institute per 1,000 screens compared to four per 1,000 screens in women who had never had the disease.

But the procedure also uncomprehensible tumors 11 proportionality more ofttimes in the survivors, even though these women had higher drawing of extra mammograms.

Survivors were also more probable to be told that the mammogram strength be display a cancer, when the blackamoor actually didn't have any.

Cancers detected by symptoms, and not screening, were more than twice as ordinary in survivors as well.

About one in eight women will develop boob cancer during their lifetime, but the quantity of ending from the disease has been dropping recently and is today inferior than 3 percent, according to the ACS.

The ACS recommends mammograms erst a year in women 40 and older, while the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force says erst every digit eld in women over 50.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/hdrHS9

(Reporting by Frederik Joelving at Reuters Health; editing by Elaine Lies)

Source